Love not Fear
connect with me on FaceBook Let's keep in touch onnect with me on Twitter

Migrants - Citizens of the World?

Wouldn't it be great if we could all move freely around a world with no borders?

When we all learn to travel with respect for the people who where there before us, for their culture and traditions, we can make that world a reality. But it will never happen while our arrival drives fear into the hearts of the native people, fear that the land they call home will be changed beyond recognition forever.

So shall we build a new world where there is nothing to be afraid of? Shall we build a world rooted in Love Not Fear?

Migration isn't the problem. The way we do migration is the problem.

If we were to ban all immigration we could never live abroad ourselves. We would have to accept imprisonment in our own land.

If you prefer the culture in another country of course you should be free to move there and embrace it. What people must never be permitted to do is move to a foreign country and impose their culture on their new neighbours. When I talk about culture here I am not referring to things like your choice of food or music. I am talking about fundamental cultural values such as freedom, free speech, freedom of religion and gender equality. If you don't believe in these things, then please don't move to a country where people do. Likewise, if you do believe in these things, don't move to a country where such views are not welcome.

I can't believe that people who have been brainwashed with newspeak call me a racist for saying these things. This philosophy is the very opposite of racism. This philosophy is rooted in Universal Equality and respect for all people regardless of race, religion or gender. And it is rooted in the founding principles of Love Not Fear where we try not to scare the crap out of each other. Multiethnic is fine but multiculturalism will never work.

I really do want to build a world where people will be free to travel and indeed settle anywhere they wish provided they come with love in their hearts and follow the first pillar of Utopia, be excellent to each-other. Be excellent especially to the established population whose families may well have lived there for hundreds or even thousands of years. Show them respect, obey their laws and fully integrate into their culture. Surely that's not too much to ask.

Relocate because you don't like where you are living, for whatever reason, and you believe another country would suit you better. Nothing wrong with that. So why are so many people moving into Britain, Europe, America, Canada, Australia and New Zeeland hell bent on turning their new country into a replica of the place they just left? Doesn't make any sense.

Migration is when you go to country with the intention of being changed by it. Invasion is when you go to a country with the intention of changing that country. What the world needs now is more migrants and fewer invaders (with or without guns and bombs).

There are nearly two hundred different countries on this planet, each with its own unique set of laws and traditions. Surely that's enough choice for everyone. But there is only one legitimate reason to want to live in a foreign country and that reason is that you love that country, every aspect of that country, just the way it is. At the very least, you must be prepared to put up with any aspects you don't like without making a fuss.

Now please don't think I am against migration or against migrants. I most certainly am not. I have lived nearly half my adult life as a migrant, 3 years in The Netherlands and 17 years in Spain. I have been with the best, most respectful of migrants and I have also been with the very worst, rude, arrogant people who made me ashamed to be British.

When I returned to England in 2012 I lived in a part of Oxford which had many migrants. Once again I saw the very best as well as the very worst of immigrants.

I am passionate about making migration work and my experiences mean that I can now see the way forward and I sharing my insights with you here.

People have no right to move just for a better climate, while hating the local culture, as many Brits are doing right now in Spain. Most love the climate and the culture of course, learn the language to the best of their ability and really try to fit in. I lived 17 years in Spain and ran a business there. Sure there were aspects of the Spanish system I found challenging but they were a small price to pay for the privilege of living there.

And in today's distopian world some countries are richer than others. There are many economic migrants moving to the richer countries. But people have absolutely no right to move for purely financial reasons with absolutely no intention of fully integrating into the local culture. And they have absolutely no right to try and bring their own sharia laws with them either. If you want to live in a country then obey that country's laws and leave your old country's laws behind.

I am very much in favour of the free movement of people but it has to be done properly. The way it is currently being implemented in many parts of the world is a nightmare. The whole idea of multiculturalism is a globalist disaster. It has led to resentment and hatred everywhere it has been tried. Migrants must adopt the host culture, that's the only way this migration thing is ever ever going to work

Migrants are quick enough to accuse their hosts of racism while being exceedingly slow to ask themselves if their own bad behaviour or bad attitude is the cause of it. In my experience there is very little genuine racism in the world and a lot of justifiable resistance to arrogant migrants who don't know how to behave abroad.

Newcomers have absolutely no right to try and change their adopted country. To do so would be disrespectful and would most certainly not be being excellent to the established population there. Entering a country in order to change it is an invasion, not a migration.

If you do not love your new country just the way it is, or at least tolerate the bits you don't like, you have no right to be there.

Of course migrants can keep their own religion. The seventh pillar of utopia, Freedom of Religion, guarantees that, so long as they practice it unobtrusively and respect the freedom of religion of those who believe differently.

When in Rome do as the Romans do - This sound advice was given to St. Augustine back in the 4th century and is just as valid now as it was then. When visiting a foreign land, follow the customs of those who live in it. It can also mean that when you are in an unfamiliar situation, you should follow the lead of those who know the ropes.This doesn't mean you can't eat your favourite food or listen to your favourite music, of course not. Be free, be an individual, have fun. Just try not to piss off the locals.

Multiculturalism is a failed experiment. National borders exist to contain and protect cultures. If you don't like the culture where you are living, move, you are not a tree. There are nearly 200 different countries to choose from. Go where you will be happiest.

Trying to run different, often incompatible cultures along side each other in the same place is a recipe for disaster. When the newcomers choose to live and dress the same way as their hosts harmony can be quickly restored. I am certainly not telling anyone how to behave or dress (within accepted limits). This must be the free choice of every individual but choices have consequences and people must be willing to accept the consequences of their choices. It may be that choosing not to fit in will result in friction with the local people. If you chose not to fit in then you caused that.

Travel broadens the mind so when you move allow your mind to be stretched and enriched by new ideas. Don't take your old narrow-minded attitudes with you.

Now please don't get the wrong end of the stick here. I am absolutely, absolutely, absolutely NOT trying to tell people how to dress. That would be totally inappropriate. It would also be compliantly against the whole theme of this book which is about freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom from the game we did not devise.

It would be awful if we were all the same, just a bunch of soleless clones walking around. Sure we are all one but we are all unique, individual expressions of the one Universal Mind and we must be free to express our individuality any way we chose.

Be free, be brash if yo want to be, be colourful, be you. Reveal as much as you want. Conceal as much as you want (provided you leave your face viable for security reasons). Enjoy the music you love and the food you love.

When I talk about newcomers adopting the host culture I mean the underlying, fundamental cultural values, not how you dress, eat or enjoy yourself. You are a beautiful, unique butterfly so fly!

I have spoken elsewhere in this book about good migrants and bad migrants based on how they behave and how much effort they put into adapting and fitting in. Please don't think I am necessarily blaming the migrants. Its true that some just come here to make trouble but many have never been abroad before and have no idea how to behave.

Rather than blame them can we please try to show them love and help them to integrate. The host nations are as much to blame as the bad migrants. We tell them our countries are multicultural so they don't need to integrate. We must stop telling them that.

Indeed we should be allocating each new arrival a social worker, maybe called an integration officer to help them blend in. There to help without judging for the first year but then responsible for making a Sufficient Progress Report on the basis of which the migrant will be allowed to stay or be repatriated.

This is one example of what can happen when migrants are neither expected or helped to assimilate into the host culture. In March 2017 Birmingham councillor Waseem Zaffar claimed that St. Clare's Catholic Primary School had breached anti-discrimination laws by refusing to allow a four year old girl to wear a Muslim headscarf.

However he had it all backwards. There was no discrimination. The 'no hats or headwear' rule applied equally to all pupils regardless of race, religion or gender.

Rather than arguing against discrimination, Zaffar was actually asking for discrimination in favour of Muslims.

Here is another UK example. A London coroner who refused to let Jewish and Muslim burials jump the queue was accused in the High Court of breaching human rights because she stood up for human rights and equally. You couldn't make this stuff up.

Two religious groups brought a legal challenge against a policy established by Mary Hassell, the senior coroner for inner north London. She had been dealing with the deaths in her jurisdiction on a first-come, first-served basis.

Jewish and Muslim groups argued that their dead should be buried first, because of their beliefs. Mary Hassell maintained that everyone should be treated equally, regardless of their religion. On the 27th April 2018, in the High Court, Sikh judge Lord Justice Singh and Mrs. Justice Whipple decreed that the equality protocol policy to be unlawful, irrational and discriminatory. Yes you read that correctly. An equally protocol has be ruled as being discriminatory because it refused to discriminate.

Britain, like many other western countries, is now being led by bigoted racist idiots who hate the native people whose families have been here for hundreds of years. They think they are being clever but all they are doing is stoking up more and ever more resentment against the immigrants.

Of course people from hot countries have a tradition of quick burial. They don't want bodies lying around stinking. I lived in Spain for 17 years. The Christians there have a similar tradition, and for exactly the same reason. But they are not in a hot country now, they are here, so they should adopt our traditions.

Because of the climate Spanish bin lorries call every day. So following the logic of this decision, should immigrants from hot countries get their bins emptied more often than everyone else? I don't think so.

Here's a great idea. I am an old codger now so maybe I will start a new religion, the Church of Codger. The main tenant of our faith is that we are entitled to twice the old age pension of everyone else. I would love to take that before the same two stupid judges just to see how consistent they would be. Britain needs a law making it illegal for anyone to discriminate against, or in favour of, any person or group on the basis of their race, religion or gender.

Actually we already have such a law, The Equally Act (2010) but it is only being applied selectively. Government must give instructions to the courts that they have to treat everyone the same regardless of race, religion or gender.

We get this so often now, newcomers demanding racist exemptions to our rules and laws and accusing us of racism when we refuse to bow to their racism. Its all backwards, its Orwellian newspeak.

Tolerance is backwards too these days - It used to mean everyone getting along and being free to be themselves. Now its supposed to be intolerant to offend intolerant people. Excuse me. Tolerant people are not easily offended and intolerant people are not welcome.

People never used to be so easily offended, we all used to have thicker skins.

In a fair society, the same rules and laws must apply to everyone regardless of race, religion or gender. And when people move to a new country they must obey all the rules and laws of that country and fully integrate into its culture.

If they are not willing and eager to do that they have no right to be there.

There will be a few of you, I know, who will not bother to try and understand what I have actually written here. They will jump to false conclusions based on their own prejudices and accuse me of racism. This happens far too often.

For the benefit of those people let me state, for the record, that the same When in Rome rule must apply to everyone, regardless of race, religion or gender.

In this chapter I have given an example of a Muslim failing to apply this rule.

Let me give a few other examples of this rule being broken.

# The British invasion of Ireland.

# The British invasion of India.

# The European invasion of the Americas.

# The British invasion of Australia.

# The British military reaction to the closure of the Suiz Canal.

# The Dutch and British invasion of South Africa.

# The British / French carve up of the Middle East following the First World War.

# The American invasion of Iraq ( twice ).

# The American invasion of Afghanistan.

# The American invasion of Lybia.

# All the American covert operations by their CIA to effect regime change in foreign countries.

These are just a few of the many times that white European and American people have interfered in other people's countries. Its not just brown skinned people doing this.

Never invade other peoples' countries. There's no telling how it will end.

There is absolutely nothing racist about my position. The same rules must apply to everyone regardless of race, religion or gender.

I am very much a product of the liberal attitudes of the 1960s, before the Liberals and Greens were infiltrated by globalists.

Love not Fear

Kindle version (UK)

Paperback version (UK)

Kindle version (USA)

paperback version (USA)

free PDF version